Review: The Left Hand of Darkness – Ursula K. Le Guin

045 - The Left Hand of Darkness

Rating – 2*

The Left Hand of Darkness is a book that I’ve wanted to read for quite a long time. It’s certainly been on my radar for at least 18 months, and I’ve had it on my shelf for around a year. I had high hopes for it, as it seemed to be right up my alley (sci-fi, gender, sexuality etc.) and I so desperately wanted to love this book. As you can tell, I really didn’t enjoy it as much as I had hoped. This is probably going to get a little ranty, because I have Feelings about this book.

As always with books I have high expectations for, I go in quite harshly. I think maybe if I had read this book at a time when I was more influential – or generally younger. The main selling point of this book is gender/biological sex and the fact that the native species on the planet our protagonist goes to are ambisexual (meaning they are neither gender, but have traits of both) who take on the role of binary male/female when they enter their ‘mating season’. That premise sounded fantastic, but for me it was actually handled quite poorly.

Our main character, Genly Ai, struggles with this fluidity of gender – and as such nearly every character in this book is referred to as he/him, traits associated with women are considered negative in a character and there’s only so much of that I can take without going in to a blind rage. I found myself getting very frustrated throughout, which really took away from a lot of the good things about this book – things like politics and the world building, which had I not been angry would have maybe been more enjoyable. To me, rather than a planet full of ambisexual beings, the planet was full of men who happened to sometimes have babies – for me this missed the mark on exploring the fluidity of gender.

I understand when this was written there wasn’t the acceptance that there is today, or the tact in language, but there are simple things that could have worked which did “exist” back when this was first written – simply put gender neutral pronouns are very simple things, but omitted from use. It’s an alien race, there was scope to create gender neutral pronouns which were unique to the Gethenian people. Why are parents referred to as fathers, children as sons, and siblings as brothers if it’s a genderless society, and all beings are equal? If this book had been set on a planet where it was entirely male and they occasionally gave birth, I probably wouldn’t have read it, but I wouldn’t have this issue. And if you haven’t realised by this point, I have an issue!

Once I had hold of this issue, it got under my skin and completely detracted any of my initial excitement over it. I lost what little emotional connection I had with the characters, reading it felt like a chore, and I found myself very much uncaring as to how it was going to end. I don’t often skim books, but the last 50 to 100 pages of this I did simply speed read to get it over with.


2 thoughts on “Review: The Left Hand of Darkness – Ursula K. Le Guin

  1. femaleinferno says:

    I remember reading this when it first came out and how it was praised for it’s controversial take on the roles of gender and sexuality – especially because it was widely accessible in schools. I picked it up because I love sci-fi and fell in love with it quickly. At the time, being gay was still taboo and discriminated against. and LeGuin is also a staunch feminist writer – I believe her choice of pronouns, although viewed from today may feel inaccurate and politically insensitive, for the time of it’s release was ground breaking. Especially in a field dominated be men in the genre and publishing landscape. Though I like your perspective about the pronouns used – it may not have gotten published, or the exposure it had if LeGuin had used today’s appropriate descriptions of genderless pronouns at the time of publishing – the editors, schools, and audience would not have been as receptive. Simply because the concept of sexuality and gender had not been widely explored in public as it is today. Certainly books were banned if even a hint of it was explored. There was no LGBT literature to be seen. LeGuin found a unique way of exploring these themes in a hostile climate. There wasn’t a plethora of female protagonists in this genre either. Looking back it feels like a narrow-minded sad state of affairs in the era of literate I grew up in. Some novels I loved back then don’t hold true now – but I love the evolution the publishing landscape has had and the new unique voices that are now expressed.

    I wonder what a modern day re-edit of ‘The Left Hand of Darkness’ would read like…

    • ashleighmuses says:

      I can imagine how ground breaking it was when it was first published. And I think even if I had read it when I was more impressionable – a young teen – this would have had an enormous impact on me. I think a modern re-edit could be something equally as ground breaking today as the original was when it was first published!

      Thank you for that reply! Really enjoyed reading it 😊

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.